How about the game "Casino War"? Any strategy can be generated by Ion's FFG?

[Ion Saliu]

Greetings Ion, your Anti-Spam-killer (ASK) has screwed me up. I've attempted to reply to your accusations, but the ASK blocked my posts. Thanks for your Sic Bo calculations. Bye.

That’s because you are a spammer, in addition to being a casino scumbug. There are worldwide repositories for notorious spambugs. You are DONE!

[Ion Saliu]

Indeed, I was wrong … but for the right reason. I saw immediately that number: 108 favorable situations. Also, immediately, I reported them to total number of cases, 216.

Rather, I should have compared that new “favorable” number to the inflexible number of unfavorable cases: 125. 125 is a given, it never changes.

The house edge would have come all the way down to 0% only if the casino would have added enough extra favorable situations to 108 to equal 125. For example, the triple paying 19 to 1. In that case, 91 + 15 + 19 = 125.

Main point I wanna make here is the issue of casino moles. No doubt in my mind, I was correct to identify the two scumbags as casino moles. In fact, I will coin here another term: scumbugs. The indication and the mole patterns are so clear to me! The degree of certainty is very, very low that I am wrong. Being wrong means hurting a very, very low percentage of honest people. I’m sorry — but my survival is far more important than hurting somehow other people’s feelings.

Just look at that “incestuous in desire” mole, Orestes. When I detected him on covad.net, he immediately took his laptop to the Atlantic City Free Public Library (acfpl.org). The covad.net ISP indicated to me past run-ins with casino scumbugs.

They fooled me a few times. I’m sure they’ll always try. But, I will be intolerant in dealing with casino moles and all manners of scumbugs from now on. That’s a fair form of self-defense.

Ion Saliu,
Terminator At-Large

[Ion Saliu]

vBulletin, the software running these forums, is terrible at times … especially when aggravated by that so-called SEO “optimization” (vBSEO). I edit posts — and the edits are not recorded! I access my forums — but the Internal Server Error meets me more often than not! I had to Refresh/Reload the browsers more often than not . . .

[Ion Saliu]

The infamous Gambler's Fallacy was the first bullet shot at yours truly, as it were. I was promoting the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG) and potentially winning gambling systems derived from the FFG. My opponents, most of them vociferous and aggressive, posed me with this “mathematical” situation:

“You lose once; the probability that you will lose next time is the same as before. You lose twice; the probability that you will lose the third time in a row is the same as before.... and so on.... ad infinitum, if you will....” It's like a god of odds will always “create” losing outcomes for the player (always winning situations for the gambling house)!

I created a special page dedicated to the gambler's fallacy and the reversed gambler's fallacy:

Gambler's Fallacy, Reversed Gamblers Fallacy, Probability