Bright3 W3.7 Report Explanation

[gabe406]

Hello Ion,

I love working with your reports and have started to work with the Hi/Lo/Odd/Even reports in the W3.7 report using Bright3 version 13.0. I noticed that in the Frequency of 3 Condition Groups for 200 drawings in the OdEv1, OdEv3, OdEv3 section the conditons look like they are duplicated with different results. For example, there are 2 seperate 1,1,1. Are these both the same data? Not sure which data to look at. I appreciate your time in advance to look at this.

Thanks
Gabe

*** Frequency of 3-Condition Groups in 200 Drawings ***
OdEv1 OdEv2 OdEv3
1 1 1 times: 23
* Skips: 16 4 7 2 10 1 7 3 0 1 1 1 0 34 5 14 2 10 12 7 11 8 14
* Sorted Skips: 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 7 7 7 8 10 10 11 12 14 14 16 34
* Median Skip: 7

1 1 1 times: 22
* Skips: 6 7 0 6 15 7 7 26 3 3 0 8 4 7 13 0 5 6 0 7 34 14
* Sorted Skips: 0 0 0 0 3 3 4 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 13 14 15 26 34
* Median Skip: 6

1 2 1 times: 25
* Skips: 1 11 3 0 0 0 3 1 17 3 0 2 29 8 1 1 12 25 8 13 2 17 4 7 4
* Sorted Skips: 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 7 8 8 11 12 13 17 17 25 29
* Median Skip: 3

1 2 1 times: 35
* Skips: 2 6 0 16 5 16 0 3 3 3 5 1 0 0 5 4 2 10 6 5 3 0 19 8 4 0 2 8 1 1 4 3 11 4 1
* Sorted Skips: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 8 8 10 11 16 16 19
* Median Skip: 3

[gabe406]

EDIT: Closer investigation shows that the conditions:

1, 1, 2
1, 2, 2
2, 1, 1
2, 2, 1

in the OdEv1 OdEv2 OdEv3 section are not present. Am I reading this right?

I also do not see any results for the InDe1, InDe2, InDe3 conditions. This is a great report and I enjoy looking at what is here, I was curious if the items in this report are as is or if there needs to be updates made to it. thanks for your reply.

Gabe

[Ion Saliu]

Gabe:

First of all, I gave you a serious warning: Bad formatting; too many posts without substance. Formatting is of the essence here, especially for the reason of clarity. The substance of the posts is also very important.

There are many message boards full of badly formatted posts. Even worse, the messages have no substance at all, except for one-word or one-line responses (like WOW! THANKS! GREAT POST, GOOGOO!) Some of those forums are dying every day, as they perform very poorly in searches (low-level content, bad format, etc.)

As of your posting: Please restrain from posting to just praise me. I don’t need anybody’s praise. Rather, I would be grateful if members will act positively when they see cases of piracy against me (as I just posted in the Administrative forum).

Now, that W3.7 pick-3 report has, indeed, a glitch. The Odd-Even section shows repeats of 3-digt permutations: 1-1-1 then 1-1-1 gain; the second 1-1-1 string should read 1-1-2. The frequencies are correct, however. The repeat-permutations should be like the corresponding string in the High-Low section.

The Increase-Decrease groups are intentionally left out because they are variable, not fixed as Odd-Even and High-Low. The Odd-Even and High-Low permutations are independent of the pick-3 drawing. The Increase-Decrease permutations are always determined by the previous lottery draw.

I considered the W3.7 report obsolete, but users of my software requested that I keep it in the report generator. The better choice is SkipDecaFreq.exe (menu #3, function D = Skips, Decades, Frequencies). It creates 3 SK reports and it offers a strategy-checking function that also includes the skips, decades, and the frequency groups. SkipDecaFreq.exe offers a whole lot more power.

As of updating, I wrote a while ago that I think now of methods of better protecting my software. I am way too much pirated and robbed. Implementing licensing keys related to the hardware would definitely cut down piracy.

Best of luck!

Ion Saliu

[gabe406]

Ion,

My apologies for prasing you and your work. I will discontinue to do so in the future. I have also done my part preventing your software from being pirated by directing all inquireies to your site for payment, and I also look for those that fail to register from your site. I would like to be in full compliance with your forum, yet, unfortunately I fail to understand how I could have better presented this information or know what you meant by "Bad formatting; too many posts without substance."

I never intended to post without substance, but to promote and openly discuss the very parts of your software to encourage the exchange of ideas, strategies, and possible theories of both your book and your reports. What I presented here was not Wow! Thanks! Great! but what I believed to be the start of getting minds together to think about YOUR software.

Unfortunately, I was very excited with your work and I wanted to thank you for that. Now I understand that this is not acceptable and will refrain from doing so as mentioned above. I truly hope that my future posts are more acceptable and of substance as you will allow. I have more wonderful results that I would like to share in regards to pick 3 strategies but will hold off on them until I get a better sense of how and what to post. I appreciate your time and resources in this forum.

Gabe