New Lotto-5 Software: NOT NOT-Win to WIN

**Ion Saliu** · 11-23-2010, 02:19 PM

I. New Lotto-5 Software, Partial Release

It has a lot to do with fairness. I emailed BrianPA a group of special 5-lotto number programs a while ago:

http://forums.saliu.com/showthread.p...r-Future/page2

He had created another thread with regards to purging an output file in such a manner that no lotto combination from a so-categorized BAD file was among the combinations generated. I don’t have to explain this or anything else. But BrianPA deserved more specific information and software:

http://forums.saliu.com/showthread.p...g-Combinations

BrianPA had reminded me of a valuable old lottery theory … I had almost forgotten that reversed lottery strategy!

I had also those “technical” Internet problems I posted about (caused by the stupidiots at PC Tools)!

I was able to finalize the lotto-5 programs I had emailed to BrianPA in incomplete form. In total fairness, I just made the completed (and thoroughly tested) programs available to all registered members of SALIU.COM:

Download the new B5.exe here — the menu of Bright5.exe
Download the new Combine5-10.exe here
Download the new LottoGroupSkips5.exe here
Download the new SkipPair5.exe here .

The programs have been thoroughly tested at the tightest filter setting: min and max = (min + 1). SkipPair5.exe should be used only for Pairs, then Pair Report. They’ve run absolutely perfectly.

The programs are not compressed or zipped. Download them to your C:\Bright5 folder; allow the overwriting of the old files. The new menu (B5.exe) will run without problem, but some programs are not present, or not in the final incarnation. The new Bright5 adds the programs that were specific to Bright15.exe previously.

This is not meant to be a tutorial. But I understand now that a really large textbook on lottery software would be of much help. Who knows …

The next post will show some graphics on how to run the new programs.

But, please, be mindful. I upgrade all my lottery software at my leisure. Nobody may interfere with my leisure. I have not set a date on the release of the absolutely final versions of my lottery software. The testing is much faster these days, but it still takes time. I will not rush without thorough testing. I will not rush until I’m sure that’s the software I want to release — without need to improve or update for years to come …

The current versions of my lottery software are still the very best out there. You don’t have to discard of them. They still work great. Selecting the filters will still be your main task. I am talking to normal, reasonable human beings. If you followed closely, you know there are countless lottery strategy possibilities. Stick with a few strategies diligently. They will hit — don’t let that happen after you gave up (or totally forgot) a lottery strategy!

I don’t do all this because I am under some contractual obligations. I am under no obligation to improve my offerings. If my offerings are not at fault, I am not obliged to change a thing. Perfecting may not be a social-contract obligation. I do all this because I am an element of my species. Homo sapiens evolved at an accelerated pace because of pride. “I am proud ergo I excel.”

… To be continued by

Parpaluck

**Ion Saliu** · 11-23-2010, 02:27 PM

“Tell me lies…
Tell me sweet, little lies…”
(Fleetwood Mac)

The biggest thing of this latest lotto software is the LIE purging feature. People are raging about it now … It is not panacea, for sure … for there is no such thing as panacea …

The LIE name looks curious. The better one I had was NOT files. As in ‘that output file will NOT have winners the next lottery drawing’. Problem was NOT is a widely used keyword in computer programming. That’s why I chose LIE — still a short word with similar significance. As in ‘if that output file will hit in the next lottery drawing, that will be a LIE’.

Ye know, I started my Internet life in the year of grace 1997. I politely attended newsgroups. The first one was rec.gambling.lottery. It was random (that is, by pure chance) that one Home sapiens who had visited my newly born Web site had discovered the by-now-famous Fundamental-Formula-of-Gambling (FFG). He was shocked by the FFG — so he wanted some advice (if not comfort) from his peers. My newly born Web site had received an incredible high number of visitors, by the standards of that day! So, I joined the main referrer …

I started to post in that newsgroup. Most participants loved it. But a small percentage of them turned into googoos:

Updates to Pick Lottery, Lotto, Roulette Software; Googoos.

The original participants were true believers in lottery strategies. Mathematics rules, their anthem was. Within a couple of years, they would give up their lottery theories. My theories were so good that the googoos realized their theories had no prayer! So, they decided, at unison, to fight any mathematical theory that would claim the possibility of winning the lottery as a result of sophisticated analyses. They would fight so fiercely that they wouldn’t even allow my name be mentioned … not even as a foe!

So, my googoos would always scream: “You will NOT win the lottery!” And I sez: “Wait a minute! If you know NOT, you also know YES. YES is the opposite of NOT! If an output lotto file will NOT win, you simply eliminate that output. Consequently, the new output, after purging the NOT, will WIN!”

It is one of the fundamental laws of logic: The negation of negation is affirmation. And that’s how my reversed lottery strategy took off.

The LIE feature is accessible in the 3rd screen of Bright5: Auxiliary Programs 2:

The LIE function is available only in the Combine5-10.exe program at this time. It can be run either with option G = Generate 10-Number Combos or L = Purge Numbers from LIE Files. Press Y (for Yes) to enable the LIE-purging function. Of course, first you must create at least one LIE file.

… To be continued by

Parpaluck

…

**Adam** · 11-23-2010, 02:29 PM

Ion,

I can only say thank you for all your hard work and aiming at perfection, if there is any under the sun.

Adam

**Ion Saliu** · 11-23-2010, 02:33 PM

“With random precision rode on the steel breeze.”
(Pink Floyd)

You know for sure that none of the lotto combinations in LIE5.1 will hit in the very next lottery drawing. Moreover, you can go further. You can expect, sometimes, that not even 2-number groups from the combinations of LIE files will hit the next lottery draw! In such case, a huge proportion of lotto combinations will be eliminated from play! In fact, only very few combinations will be left as tickets!

Here is an example. I’ll use the Pairs feature in SkipPair5.exe, the Reporting function. The program is available in the 4th screen of Bright5 (Auxiliary Programs 3).

Code:

                   LOTTO-5 Pairing Report by Draw
                   File: C:\LOTTO5\PA-5; Date: 11-22-2010
                   Draws Analyzed:  200 
                   Pairings Draw Range:  86 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Line      Num           Num           Num           Num           Num      Lowest Highest
 no.        1             2             3             4             5        Pair   Pair
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1   6 10 22 27    2  5 31 36    1 11 26 39    2  5 36 39    8 18 32 37    1     39 
    2   4 11 14 41   10 12 22 24    1 29 31 32    2 11 14 26    9 13 25 30    1     41
…
   74* 24 31 37 41   25 37 39 41   18 31 39 41   19 21 31 38   24 31 36 38    18    41
…
  198* 30 37 40 41   14 20 31 41   14 18 23 29   16 18 28 35   10 28 30 36    10    41
…

This report shows each lotto number in the drawing and the ranks of the pairings that accompanied the respective number. The ranks are from 1 to 42 (this is a 43-number lotto game that draws 5 winning numbers). Rank 1 for a pair means the best pair for the respective lotto number. The respective lotto number was paired most with the lotto number X that represents pair rank #1.

For example, the last lotto draw of the report is line #1. The first lotto number in that drawing is identified by Num 1. The lotto number came out with pairings of the following ranks: 6, 10, 22, 27. Two of the pairs were in the top 10 (the best 10 pairings). As a whole, the lotto drawing had one top pair (1, in column Lowest Pair). The worst pair in the drawing had rank 39 (in column Highest Pair).

The drawings marked with an * represent the condition of a very effective LIE lotto strategy. The strategy allows the LIE filter of ID 2. That is, it eliminates all 2-number groups from every combonation of a LIE5 output lotto file. In my testing, the final output amounted to 20 lotto tickets! Not t5o mention that the player can safely skip play for at least 50 lottery drawings! Saves serious money!

Here is how I reached a LIE5 file like that. The parpaluck (range of lotto drawings to determine the pairing ranks) was 86 (the double of numbers in the lotto game: 43). I ran Super Utilities (SoftwareLotto5.exe) in Bright5 (main screen). Option: F = Frequency Number by Number. I named the BEST pairing file TOP5. Number of best pairs to save: 10. Still in Super Utilities, I select M = Make/Break/Position. I generate lotto combosnations from the TOP5 file, option 1: Each number and 4 of its top 10 pairings. I name the output LIE5.1 (instead of the BREAK5.4 default).

LIE5.1 consists of each of the 43 lotto numbers, plus 4 of its top 10 pairs. That situation represents a very rare occurrence in real life. It happens once every 200 lottery drawings, if that. At least one of the lotto numbers in a draw came out with 4 of its top-10 pairs. More precisely, the pair frequency reporting is done from drawing to drawing. Therefore, the pair ranking can change from draw to draw.

This lotto LIE strategy appears complicated, but it ain’t, really. The real complicated thing is writing about the strategy. It takes quite a long time…

By the way –
The filters in Combine5-10.exe have now maximum levels, in addition to the minimum levels. The maximum levels do NOT work in 10-number lotto combination generation. No questions asked … thanx!

So, for now, that’s all I wrote.

Best of luck to all!

Ion Saliu

**Ion Saliu** · 11-23-2010, 02:50 PM

The LIE strategy is NOT guaranteed for the 10-number lotto generator. It is applicable, with a high degree of certainty, to the 5-number lotto combination generators. Functions in Combine5-10.exe: L (Lexicographic), R (Random), and P (Purge a 5-number output file).

"Standard, standard deviation
Why's so Random the Creation?"
"Well… It's All Random overall,
Be it straight, crooked, or small.”
(Genesis — The Book of Truth)

**Adam** · 11-23-2010, 03:39 PM

Ion,

No questions allowed? Not referring to why no max level of filters, but rather good or bad way of testing LIE files in action.

Adam

**BrianPA** · 11-23-2010, 04:05 PM

Ion,

GREAT job!! It looks really nice. I like the addition of "Lowest Pair & Highest Pair".

Will be doing more strategy hunting tonight!

Again Congrats!!!

Best Always,
BrianPA

**BrianPA** · 11-23-2010, 04:43 PM

Originally Posted by Ion Saliu

By the way –
The filters in Combine5-10.exe have now maximum levels, in addition to the minimum levels. The maximum levels do NOT work in 10-number lotto combination generation. No questions asked … thanx!

Ion,

I'm very sorry for asking this, but, I believe a little more clarity would help. It is a very simple question and would help others also.

Example: We set the pairs to Min=30 & Max=60
Does this setting mean that "ALL" the pairs have to fall in this range, or that "AT LEAST ONE" pair has to be present within that range.

I hope I dont get blasted for asking a question about something that you wanted NO QUESTIONS asked. I just thought it was relative to the new filter settings, since they were originally intended for the 10-number combinations.

THANKS & SORRY about the question!!

Respectfully Yours,
BrianPA

**Adam** · 11-23-2010, 04:51 PM

Brian,

Sorry to butt in, but I'm almost sure it refers to that one pair only. Hope I'm not leading you astray.

Adam

**Ion Saliu** · 11-23-2010, 06:49 PM

I'm very sorry for asking this, but, I believe a little more clarity would help. It is a very simple question and would help others also.

Example: We set the pairs to Min=30 & Max=60
Does this setting mean that "ALL" the pairs have to fall in this range, or that "ONLY ONE" pair has to be present.

Britser, Aditser et al.:

Those filters have nothing to do with pairings! The filter named PAIRS is a simple coincidence. It is called TWO in other programs in Bright5 (e.g. Combine5.exe).

The PAIRS or (TWO filter refers to 2-number groups in a 5-number lotto combonation. Par exemple, you set PAIRS (TWO) equal to 10. The minimum level will eliminate every lotto combination that has 2 or more numbers in common with every combination within the range of 10 past drawings. The maximum level will generate only lotto combosnations that contain at least 2 numbers in common with every combination within the range of 9 past drawings. This is how all traditional filters work in my lottery software.

As of pairings, your concern is the parpaluck (the range of analysis to determine the ranks of the pairings). It’s clearer to say pairings when referring to … pairs! Pairings and PAIRS (TWO) are like apples and oranges!

The maximum level of the aforementioned filters is disabled for the10-number combination generating ONLY. The generation is very slow even without the maximum level enabled!

I hope it’s clear now.

Best of luck!

Parpaluck
(i.e. Ion Saliu, not Range of analysis)

“People call me Parpaluck
Because I wish ‘em good luck
And give ‘em the software
To get lucky with fanfare.”

**Adam** · 11-23-2010, 07:01 PM

Thanks Ion and sorry Brian.

I was mistaken. A good lesson not to be even " almost" sure. Just got mixed up amidst filters.

Adam

**BrianPA** · 11-23-2010, 08:12 PM

Thanks Ion!

Very clear now. I just have to learn how to keep my mouth shut sometimes. Just got excited and wasn't thinking properly. My apologies!

Best Wishes,
Brian

**Ion Saliu** · 11-24-2010, 01:59 PM

Britser, Aditser et al.:

It’s okay! No need to apologise whatsoever!

It all stresses the need for a lottery book. It would be real big — but who has the time to write it?! At least two individuals offered their services to write such a book to handle my lottery software. The book would have been based on the information I would have provided. Not only that I would have paid a fee for the writing service … the authors would have sold the book as their own (zero royalties for me!)

Still at the filters topic. The following filters are applicable in Combine5-10.exe:

ONES (SINGLES) — it eliminates every number from every combination in the range of past drawings (minimum); or, it generates only combinations that contain at least one number from each drawing in the range set by the user (the maximum level).

PAIRS (TWO) — it eliminates every 2-number group (could also be 3-, 4-, 5- number groups) from every combination in the range of past drawings (minimum level); or, it generates only combinations that contain at least one 2-number group (could also be 3-, 4-, 5- number groups) from each drawing in the range set by the user (maximum level).

TRIPLES (THREE) — it eliminates every 3-number group (could also be 4-, 5- number groups) from every combination in the range of past drawings (minimum level); or, it generates only combinations that contain at least one 3-number group (could also be 4-, 5- number groups) from each drawing in the range set by the user (maximum level).

QUADS (FOUR) — it eliminates every 4-number group (could also be 5- number groups) from every combination in the range of past drawings (minimum level); or, it generates only combinations that contain at least one 4-number group (could also be 5- number groups) from each drawing in the range set by the user (maximum level).

QUINTET (FIVE) — it eliminates every 5-number group (‘5 of 5’) from every combination in the range of past drawings (minimum level); or, it generates only combinations that contain at least one 5-number group (‘5 of 5’) from each drawing in the range set by the user (maximum level).

The filters are calculated by LottoGroupSkips5.exe. It is on screen #3 of Bright5: Auxiliary Programs 2, option R = Generate BRIGHT-15 Report.

As for all traditional LotWon filters, only the first line of each drawing in the LottoGroupSkips5 report gives the right lotto combonation. That is, the minimum level of each filter will lead to the right combination. The maximum level is at least (minimum + 1).

The report for 5/43 lotto drawing #1:

Code:

                   * LOTTO-5 Skips Report: Ones, Pairs, Trips, Quads, Quintet
                   File: C:\LOTTO5\D5; Date: 11-22-2010
                   Draws Analyzed:  100 

===========================================================================================
ONES Skips   PAIRS  Skips  T R I P L E S  Skips       Q U A D S     Skips    QUINTET Skips
===========================================================================================
              DRAW # 1 :  15  19  35  39  42   ~ Reverse Inner Filters: No
             ----------------------------------------------------------------
 19   0     19- 35   13     15- 39- 42    450    15- 19- 35- 42     7352         957834
 35  12     19- 42   44     19- 35- 39    689    15- 19- 35- 39    12843
 15  18     15- 19   84     19- 39- 42    727    15- 35- 39- 42    22067
 39  25     15- 42  118     15- 35- 39    807    15- 19- 39- 42    31483
 42  30     35- 42  121     15- 19- 35   1007    19- 35- 39- 42    91385
            19- 39  166     35- 39- 42   1336
            15- 35  171     15- 19- 42   1641
            15- 39  201     15- 35- 42   1827
            35- 39  246     15- 19- 39   2456
            39- 42  450     19- 35- 42   4288
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We would have hit the right combination (15 19 35 39 42) if we had set the filters like this (the tightest setting):

ONES: min=0, max=1
PAIRS: min=13, max=14
TRIPLES: min=450, max=451
QUADS: min=7352, max=7353
QUINTET: min=957834, max=957835

What is the real efficiency of each filter? We can determine it logically. The easiest is the QUINTET. If we set the minimum level of QUINTET to 1, the program eliminates exactly 1 combination. If we set the maximum level of QUINTET to 1, the program generates exactly 1 combination. It is the drawings (combonation) in line #1 of the data file.

If we set the maximum level of QUADS to 1, the program generates exactly 191 combinations. One lotto 5-43 combinations can be broken down into C(5, 4) = 5 groups of 4 numbers. Each 4-number group gets combined with the remaining 43 – 5 = 38 numbers, taken one at a time. 5 * 38 = 190 combinations. But there is also one ‘5 of 5’ combination, as maximum of QUADS means at least one group of 4 numbers from the previous drawing.

The calculations are more complicated for TRIPLES and PAIRS.

If we set the maximum level of TRIPLES to 1, the program generates exactly 21,591 combinations. One lotto 5-43 combinations can be broken down into C(5, 3) = 10 groups of 3 numbers. Each 3-number group gets combined with the remaining 43 – 5 = 38 numbers, taken 2 at a time: C(38, 2) = 703. 10 * 703 = 7030 combosnations. But there are also 4-number groups that will be part of the combinations generated. And there is also one ‘5 of 5’ combination, as maximum of TRIPLES means at least one group of 3 numbers from the previous drawing.

The report has another interesting field: Reverse Inner Filters. The inner filters in Combine5-10.exe behave differently from the lottery software you are running now. But soon all my lottery programs will have the same type of inner filters. The new inner filters hit around 5% of the time (5 times in 100 lotto drawings). People can use it as a lottery strategy that hits rarely but generates a fairly low amount of lotto combosnations. Apply other filters at safe levels and you can dramatically reduce the amount of lotto combinations to play (COW or cost of winning). We only need to hit the jackpot once a year … even once in two years … and that’s good money! I’m talking here the 5-number lotto game, which has a daily drawing.

Best of luck to all! Happy Thanksgiving to you, Britser, and my fellow Americans! Let’s have a good drink or two and watch a good football game or two! Unfortunately, football is a huge disappointment on Thanksgiving Day. The Detroit Lions? Huh? No team has been lousier for the past dozen years! This year adds two more lousy teams to the fray (pan … I mean, pun intended): Dallas Cowboys and Cincinnati Bengals.

Parpaluck,
(i.e. Ion Saliu, not Ranger of lottery analysis)

Filtering, Filters in Lottery Software, Lotto Software Reduce Combinations

**Adam** · 11-24-2010, 02:27 PM

Ion,

Pls first accept my apologies for posting it, but I'm at a loss. I did some testing and do not know where and what kind of mistake I made.

To begin with I ran SkipPair5. exe to see where the pairs come from in last 200 draws.

Code:

                   LOTTO-5 Pairing Report by Draw
                   File: C:\LOTTO\5DATA.TXT; Date: 11-24-2010
                   Draws Analyzed:  200 
                   Pairings Draw Range:  84 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Line      Num           Num           Num           Num           Num      Lowest Highest
 no.        1             2             3             4             5        Pair   Pair
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1   6 21 36 41    3 11 20 28    4 17 20 41   17 18 34 41    8 28 29 39    3     41 
    2   6 12 30 33   20 29 33 38   17 19 24 25    7 16 21 33   12 27 28 34    6     38 
    3   1  7 18 19    4 15 29 35    3  6 27 33   12 16 31 35    1  5 14 22    1     35 
   23  28 35 39 40   22 24 25 32   18 24 32 40   17 20 29 40   21 31 36 40    17    40 
   24  11 23 38 39   18 22 33 38   25 27 31 41   11 18 22 30    4  8 17 23    4     41 
   25  12 19 30 34    5 14 19 22    3 12 20 39    4 13 18 34   13 14 18 20    3     39 
   26   3  6 12 21    3 15 26 33    6 21 26 34    4 18 21 35    4 14 23 41    3     41 
   27  11 21 28 40   22 23 24 38    8 20 27 37    4 11 12 22    5 11 17 21    4     40 
   28  20 30 34 36    6 22 34 36    6 15 36 39    4 31 36 41   25 35 38 40    4     41 
   29  10 18 22 37    6 13 21 35    4 12 17 23    3  7 29 38    4 12 18 28    3     38 
   30   1 11 27 36    2 20 28 33   31 33 35 39    7 29 35 36   10 17 29 34    1     39 
   31   3 13 17 37    6  9 36 37    4  6 13 24    1  4 11 37    4 22 33 37    1     37 
   32   1  2 11 15   11 18 24 35    4  5 10 27    1  4 20 38    2 21 24 36    1     38 
   33   1 24 33 34    5 34 39 40    1 13 24 31    2 24 30 39    5  9 14 35    1     40 
   34   1 26 31 39    4  5 17 26    5 14 27 32   11 17 19 36   10 15 22 32    1     39 
   35  16 27 28 34   23 27 28 31   12 25 27 28   11 23 32 40   13 17 25 29    11    40

So it looks that draw line 23 and draw line 35 are very good for LIE strategy.

I wondered how to test it. I deleted latest 23 draws and saved them in another file as future draws. I was not sure how the ranking of numbers followed so I checked first PAIR 5 file to see if it corresponded to what I could see in SkipPair5.exe for line 23. The values were the same.

Then I exactly followed the routine. I ran Frequency function for the same Parpaluck as SkipPair5.exe i.e. 84 draws. I named the Grid with 10 best pairings Top5 and then used Make/Break with option 1. I generated a bit over 8400 combinations and called the file LIE5.2.
Then I ran Combine 5-10.exe enabling LIE5.2. with ID= 2. It generated 96 combinations. Next I checked for winners. It comes below:

Code:

                   Lotto-5 Winning Number Checking - NO 2-hits
                   Files: OUT5.2 ( 96 ) against > C:\LOTTO\LASTPICK5.TXT ( 23 )
                   Date: 11-24-2010

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Line    Combinations                          5       4       3  
   no.       Checked                            Hits    Hits    Hits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      1    2  3  4 26 37            in draw #            15 
      2    2  3  4 26 40            in draw #                    15 
      3    3  4 18 26 37            in draw #                    15 
      8    3  4 26 33 37            in draw #                    15 
     11    3  4 26 37 39            in draw #                    15 
     17    3  4 33 37 42            in draw #                    15 
     22    3 18 26 37 39            in draw #                    15 
     24    3 26 33 37 39            in draw #                    15 
     33    4 11 36 39 40            in draw #                    23 
     51    4 26 31 33 40            in draw #                    16 
     53    4 26 31 39 40            in draw #                    16 
     86   26 31 33 39 40            in draw #                    16 
     93   31 33 37 38 39            in draw #                    5 
     94   31 33 38 39 40            in draw #                    5 
     96   33 36 39 40 41            in draw #                    23 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Total Hits:                             0       1       14 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

I felt I was doing something wrong. So I got back to Super Utilities. This time instead of making a Grid with ten best pairings I used option of Best and entered 10 here. Next I used Make/Break option.
It gave me only 283 combinations. I named it Lie5.1

Again I ran Combine 5-10.exe enabling option Lie5.1 this time and again put ID= 2. It generated over 16,000 combinations.

I checked it for winners:

Code:

                   Lotto-5 Winning Number Checking - NO 2-hits
                   Files: OUT5.2 ( 16032 ) against > C:\LOTTO\LASTPICK5.TXT ( 23 )
                   Date: 11-24-2010

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Line    Combinations                          5       4       3  
   no.       Checked                            Hits    Hits    Hits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
     80    1  4  6  8 10            in draw #                    3 
     93    1  4  6 18 42            in draw #                    22 
 11464   11 29 36 39 41            in draw #            23 
  11465   11 29 36 40 41            in draw #    23 *
  11466   11 29 36 40 42            in draw #            23 
  11467   11 29 36 41 42            in draw #            23 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Total Hits:                             1       98      2757 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now it's here.

What is my mistake?

Thank you.

Adam

**Adam** · 11-24-2010, 02:39 PM

I'm sorry. I should have started with it. Happy Thanksgiving to all of you. Enjoy yourselves!

All the best

Adam

**Goldenstate** · 11-24-2010, 02:43 PM

Ion,

Thank you very much for the incredible effort and time that you put in your software to upgrade and improve it and then offer it free of charge to the members of your community.
I want you to know that it is highly appreciated.

In another thread, you recommended to increase the size of the data file to at least 4,000,000 (four million) combinations for the lotto 5. I was wondering if this new upgrade is going to slice the data file into four slices of one million each now.

In my state, we have lotto 5/39. I am going to make 8 sim files ( actually 8 files of 575757 total combinations each) combine them together and then shuffle them a few times and finally put my actual data on top. I think this will give me more precise filter reporting and find more whacky filter situations.

Currently, I am playing pick 3 and I do not know if I should also increase the size of my data3 file too.

Thank you again and I wish good luck and happiness for you and all your supporters.

Happy Thanksgiving

gingle · 11-24-2010, 03:27 PM

Hi Ion,

I dont want to bother to much, but i did some testing with the skippairs6.exe program and some results dont seem to fit with what the Grid file from util632 spits out for a range of analysis.

If i understood correctly, the pair6.rep. from pairskip6.exe shows the 6 numbers and the ranks of the pairs, just like the pairskip5.exe program does.

Unfortunately i found some divergences regarding the pair rankings, or maybe i do not understand how the program works ??

Let me explain: following is the pair6.rep done for the last 50 draws using an parpaluck of 98:

Code:

pair6.repoliciare.txt

Line number1 in the report represents the drawing: 11-18-20-24-31-45.

Before this drawing i made a Gridfile with Util632.exe program which shows following 5 top pairs for the 49 numbers:

Code:

GRID6TEST.TXT

So according to the pair6.rep, number 18 had lowest ranks 4 and 5, which would be according to the Gridfile numbers 31 and 11. This is correct.

However number 24 has rank 2 according to the Gridfile, but i cant find it in the pair6.rep file.

Did i understand something wrong, or how can i interpret this?

Thank You very much

Regards
gingle

**Ion Saliu** · 11-24-2010, 04:50 PM

In another thread, you recommended to increase the size of the data file to at least 4,000,000 (four million) combinations for the lotto 5. I was wondering if this new upgrade is going to slice the data file into four slices of one million each now.

Goitser:

Combine5-10.exe uses one layer only. The program does NOT require a data file of at least 4,000,000 combinations. But it is good to use a huge data file because of the QUINTET filter. As you can see, it reaches hundreds of thousands in size. You can have situations of QUINTET between, say, 400,000 to 500,000. That would be a good lotto strategy as the pivot. Add to it safe values for other filters. The other programs in Bright5 will use 4 layers of 1,000,000 combinations each.

So according to the pair6.rep, number 18 had lowest ranks 4 and 5, which would be according to the Gridfile numbers 31 and 11. This is correct.

However number 24 has rank 2 according to the Gridfile, but i can’t find it in the pair6.rep file.

Gitser:

Looks correct to me. Lotto number 18 had lotto number 24 as 2nd ranked pair. Also, lotto number 24 had lotto number 18 as 2nd ranked pair.

Code:

 18   25  24  10  31  11
…
 24   15  18  25  1  17
…

One possible confusion for some lottery players: The lotto number and the rank of a pair. The pairing rank is NOT a lotto number!

What is my mistake?

Aditser:

I will test those two conditions with my data file. TOP5 is correctly created as by GRID5, not BEST5. TOP5 should look like this (each number with its top 10 pairings):

Code:

 1   11  31  41  28  19  33  36  37  27  18
 2   41  18  21  12  11  10  27  37  17  13 
 3   23  31  8  10  13  18  5  27  28  7
…
 40   7  25  12  20  24  8  27  31  33  14
 41   2  11  12  1  13  23  36  43  20  22 
 42   28  16  18  19  4  41  43  10  11  13 
 43   23  22  41  10  19  4  7  24  28  29

That is, every lotto number, plus its top 10 pairings.

If the lowest pair shows 11 or higher, that drawings must not have a number accompanied by any top-10 pairing. Otherwise, the calculations were wrong, or the data file has problems.

In my case, that TOP5 file generated 8797 combinations in Make/Break/Position (Super Utilities). I saved them to a LIE5.1 file. I used it in general, not to a specific condition of the data file. That’s how I got those 20 combos with the LIE filter ID = 2. I will do a correct test soon for those two situations (marked by an *).

Your second example is incorrect. The BEST/WORST files have 2 real lotto numbers followed by 3 zeros. You cannot use Make/Break/Position with such files.

After my dinner …

**Adam** · 11-24-2010, 05:04 PM

Ion,

Thank you very much and sorry for troubling you on Thanksgiving.

The fact is I realized it's Thanksgiving after my posting.

I know that WORST and BEST files have 0's , but it was sort of deperate looking for a solution in a blind alley.

Adam

**Goldenstate** · 11-24-2010, 05:05 PM

Ion,

Thanks for the clarification. I was not referring to Combine5-10.exe requiring 4 million combinations but about the Bright 5 itself. Thanks again.